Crises, Contagion, and the Closed: End Country Fund Puzzle
IMF Working Papers, September 1, 1998
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Crises, Contagion, and the Closed: End Country Fund Puzzle
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Eduardo Levy Yeyati, Angel J. Ubide
- Published: September 1, 1998
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451856316.001
Summary
- Authors: Eduardo Levy Yeyati, Angel J. Ubide
- Date: September 1, 1998
- Core result: The ratio of fund prices to their fundamental value increases dramatically during a crisis, an anomaly denoted the “closed-end country fund puzzle.”
- Scope: Analysis of closed-end country fund discounts with evidence from the Mexican and East Asian crises.
- Key implication: International investors are less (more) sensitive to changes in local (global) market conditions than domestic investors; this asymmetry means foreign participation in local markets can both help dampen a crisis in the originating country and amplify contagion to noncrisis countries.
Main findings
- The ratio of fund prices to fundamental value increases dramatically during a crisis; this phenomenon is labeled the “closed-end country fund puzzle.”
- The puzzle is directly related to differing sensitivities:
- International investors are less sensitive to changes in local market conditions than domestic investors.
- International investors are more sensitive to changes in global market conditions than domestic investors.
- The asymmetry in investor sensitivities implies:
- Foreign participation can dampen a crisis in the originating country.
- Foreign participation can amplify contagion to noncrisis countries.
Mechanism and interpretation
- Behavior observed in closed-end country fund discounts during crises links to investor composition and informational/behavioral differences between domestic and international investors.
- The differential sensitivity to local versus global market conditions underlies the change in fund price–to–fundamental value ratios in crisis episodes.
Policy-relevant conclusions
- Monitoring international investor participation is important because:
- Increased foreign participation can provide stabilization effects in crisis-originating countries.
- The same increased foreign participation can raise vulnerability of other countries to contagion through amplified transmission of global shocks.
- Understanding investor sensitivity profiles (local vs. global) can inform crisis prevention and management strategies.
Content in this bundle
- Crises, Contagion, and the Closed-End Country Fund Puzzle - WP/98/143