Enforcing Public-Private Partnership Contract: How do Fiscal Institutions Matter?

November 15, 2017

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Manabu Nose. Enforcing Public-Private Partnership Contract: How do Fiscal Institutions Matter?, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 2017) accessed December 21, 2024

Disclaimer: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Summary

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have increased rapidly in emerging and developing countries, creating both opportunities and fiscal challenges. One of the main challenges is that while governments have increased commitments in guarantees and direct subsidies to promote PPPs, contractual disputes remain high with significant costs. This paper examines how fiscal institutions affect the selection of PPP contracts and the probability of contract disputes using about 6,000 PPP contract-level data. The analysis shows that larger government financing needs, lower budget transparency and bureaucratic efficiency are associated with higher probability for governments to offer guarantees. Propensity score matching results show that disputes are more common for guaranteed contracts due to adverse selection and contingent liability effects. PPP management quality and budget transparency are found to be key determinants for a longer survival of PPPs.

Subject: Budget planning and preparation, Contingent liabilities, Expenditure, Fiscal risks, Public debt, Public financial management (PFM), Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP), Tax incentives

Keywords: Adverse selection, Asia and Pacific, Budget planning and preparation, Capital stock, Contingent liabilities, Dispute case, Dispute risk, Drive government decision, Fiscal risk, Fiscal risks, Government financing, Government involvement, Indebted government, Management quality, PIM quality index, PPP contract, PPP investment, PPP project, Propensity score matching, Provision of guarantee, Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP), Public investment management, Public-private partnerships, WP

Publication Details

Pages:

32
Volume:

---
DOI:

---
Issue:

---
Series:

Working Paper No. 2017/243
Stock No:

WPIEA2017243
ISBN:

9781484328286
ISSN:

1018-5941

FACTSHEETS

RESOURCES

TOPICS

Flagship Publications

Other Publications

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional Offices

All News

See Also

For Journalists

Press Center

RESOURCES

FLAGSHIPS

KEY SERIES

IMF NOTES

IMF Working Papers