Wage Centralization, Union Bargaining, and Macroeconomic Performance

August 1, 2002

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

James McHugh. Wage Centralization, Union Bargaining, and Macroeconomic Performance, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 2002) accessed November 21, 2024

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary

This paper addresses two questions. First, under what circumstances will a centralized wage-bargaining system offer higher output and employment than a decentralized system? Second, what is the relationship between the degree of wage centralization and inflation? The paper argues that centralized wage setting may offer worse outcomes, despite the existence of a negative coordination externality in decentralized wage setting. This is more likely to occur when the legal and institutional environment strengthens the bargaining position of the union in the centralized regime compared with unions operating in a more decentralized regime. Furthermore, as product markets become more competitive, the macroeconomic outcomes in both regimes converge, and the degree of wage centralization becomes irrelevant.

Subject: Employment, Labor markets, Real wages, Wage setting, Wages

Keywords: Nominal wage, Real wage, Utility function, WP

Publication Details

Pages:

26
Volume:

---
DOI:

---
Issue:

---
Series:

Working Paper No. 2002/143
Stock No:

WPIEA1432002
ISBN:

9781451856354
ISSN:

1018-5941

FACTSHEETS

RESOURCES

TOPICS

Flagship Publications

Other Publications

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional Offices

All News

See Also

For Journalists

Press Center

RESOURCES

FLAGSHIPS

KEY SERIES

IMF NOTES

IMF Working Papers