Archive of Quarterly Reports

Reports on Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSCs)

Standards and Codes

See Also:
Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP)

Quarterly Update on the Special Data Dissemination Standard



Quarterly Report on the Assessments of Standards and Codes—November 20021

Prepared by the Policy Development and Review Department

In consultation with other Departments

November 26, 2002

1. Work on standards continues to progress on several fronts, and this report covers the production of Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSCs) and developments related to the work on international standards and codes from May 1 to September 30, 2002, the period since the last quarterly report.2 On November 15, 2002, the Executive Board approved a 12-month pilot project that significantly advances the IMF's contribution to the international efforts to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) by adding the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) 40 Recommendations on an effective anti-money laundering framework, and the 8 Special Recommendations on Terrorism Financing (FATF 40+ 8), to the list of areas and associated standards and codes that are incorporated into the operational work of the Fund.3

2. Reviews of the FSAP and the standards and codes initiative are forthcoming.4


ROSC production

3. Between May 1 and Sept 30, 2002, an additional 77 ROSC modules were completed, for 27 economies, with 52 of these published (Table 1).5,6 This brings the total number of ROSC modules completed to 310 (for 84 economies), of which 227 have been published (for 68 economies) (Table 2).7 Fifty-three of the 77 modules covered financial sector standards assessed under the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). Two were data modules, seven were fiscal modules, and fifteen were produced by the World Bank (comprising five corporate governance, seven accounting and auditing, and three insolvency and creditor rights modules).

Selected standards-related developments

4. As part of the Annual Meetings Program of Seminars, the Fund organized sessions entitled "Standards and Transparency" and "Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism: Towards a New Global Standard."8

5. An interdepartmental mission, with World Bank participation, visited Beijing, Shanghai, Moscow, and Budapest in August 2002, to discuss the Fund and Bank's work on standards and codes and to seek feedback on this work, in the context of transition economies.9 The exercise was the sixth in the series of outreach missions that has been under way since June 2000. While the seminars focused on the eleven standards and codes agreed by the Fund and the Bank and the standards assessments process, including through the FSAP and ROSCs, they also covered the recent work on anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT). Participants, who were mostly from the official sector, were relatively well informed about the standards and codes initiatives. However, they thought that knowledge of the importance of standards was thin among their private sectors and welcomed further outreach by staff.

6. Fund staff hosted a briefing on standards and codes in July 2002 for a coalition of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) called "New Rules for Global Finance," which focuses on the implications of international financial architecture reform initiatives for poor countries. A particular area of interest of the group is private sector regulation and disclosure.

Private Sector Initiatives

7. In an article published on its website in Summer 2002, Fitch Ratings reported "a highly significant relationship between the publications of ROSCs and changes in sovereign ratings over the last three years."10 The article acknowledged that while one explanation for the outcome is that countries that are undertaking reforms are more likely to undertake and publish the reports, the results suggest a positive impact of compliance with standards and transparency on perceptions of creditworthiness. Standard & Poor's announced on September 13, 2002 the completion of its 2002 "Transparency and Disclosure Surveys."11 Among the findings of the U.S. segment of the Survey, released on October 15, 2002, are that for U.S. firms, disclosure is greatest for financial information and lowest for ownership structure, investor rights, and board/management structures and processes.12

Table 1. ROSC Modules Published
(From 5/1/02 to 9/30/02)1

Economies

Data

Fiscal

Mone-
tary*

Banking Super-
vision*

Insur-ance*

Secur-
ities*

Pay-ments*

Corporate Govern-
ance+

Accounting &
Auditing+

Insol-vency+

Total


Bulgaria P P P P P P 6
Burkina Faso P 1
Costa Rica P 1
Croatia P P P P P P 6
Czech Republic P 1
Hungary P P P P P 5
Luxembourg2 P P P P P 5
Malawi P 1
Mexico P 1
Morocco P 1
Namibia P 1
Poland P 1
Slovak Republic P P P P P P P 7
Sweden P P P P P 5
Switzerland P P P P P 5
Tunisia P P P P P 5
Total Completed 2 7 11 11 10 10 11 5 7 3 77
Total Published 2 4 8 8 8 8 8 2 3 1 52

Source: Staff estimates.
* ROSCs in these areas are usually assessed as part of the FSAP. The exceptions are for the following: Bulgaria-Monetary, Banking, Insurance.
+ The following ROSC was assessed as part of the Financial Sector Assessment Program: Corporate Governance-Czech Republic.
P Indicates module was published.
Second-round ROSCs are shown in bold (see footnote 6 of the Report).
1See Table 2 for the definitions of when a module is considered completed.
2As Luxembourg is a member of a monetary union, the module does not include an assessment of the monetary component of the standard.

Table 2. ROSC Modules Published
(As of September 30, 2002)1

Economies Data Fiscal Mone-
tary*
Bank-
ing Super-
vision*
Insur-
ance*
Secur-
ities*
Pay-
ments*
Corporate Govern-
ance+
Accounting
&
Auditing+
Insol-
vency+
Total Published

Albania P                   1
Algeria       P             1
Argentina P P P P             4
Armenia P P                 2
Australia P P P P             4
Azerbaijan   P                 1
Botswana P                   1
Brazil   P                 1
Bulgaria P P P, P P, P P, P P P P     11
Burkina Faso   P                 1
Cameroon2 P P P P P   P       6
Canada   P P P P P P       6
Chile P                   1
Costa Rica P                   1
Croatia     P P P P P P P   7
Czech Republic P P P, P P, P P P, P P P, P     12
Egypt, Arab Rep. of               P     1
Estonia P P P P P P P       7
Euro Area     P       P       2
Finland     P P P P P       5
France   P P               2
Gabon     P P P           3
Georgia     P P P   P P     5
Greece   P                 1
Honduras   P                 1
Hong Kong SAR of China P P P P             4
Hungary P P P, P P, P P, P P, P P, P       12
Iceland     P P P P P       5
India   P           P     2
Ireland     P P P P P       5
Israel     P P P P P       5
Japan   P                 1
Kenya                 P   1
Korea, Rep. Of   P                 1
Kyrgyz Republic   P                 1
Latvia   P P P P P P P     7
Lithuania     P P P   P P P   6
Luxembourg3     P P P P P       5
Malaysia               P     1
Malawi   P                 1
Mali   P                 1
Mauritius P                   1
Mexico   P P P P P P       6
Mongolia P P                 2
Morocco                 P   1
Mozambique   P                 1
Namibia P                   1
Nicaragua   P                 1
Pakistan   P                 1
Papua New Guinea   P                 1
Philippines               P P   2
Poland   P P P P P P P P   8
Romania P                   1
Senegal2,4     P P P P         4
Slovak Republic   P P P P P P   P P 8
Slovenia   P   P P P P       5
South Africa P                   1
Sri Lanka P                   1
Sweden P P P P P P P       7
Switzerland     P P P P P       5
Tanzania   P                 1
Tunisia P P P, P P, P P P P       9
Turkey P P           P     3
Uganda P P P P             4
Ukraine   P                 1
United Kingdom P P P P             4
Uruguay P P                 2
Zimbabwe               P     1
Total Completed 28 46 51 53 31 28 37 21 11 4 310
Total Published 25 40 34 34 26 22 24 14 7 1 227

Source: Staff estimates.
* ROSCs in these areas are usually assessed as part of the FSAP. The exceptions are for the following: Algeria-Banking; Argentina-Monetary, Banking; Australia-Monetary, Banking; Bulgaria-Monetary, Banking, Insurance; Czech Republic-Monetary, Banking, Securities; Euro Area-Monetary, Payments; France-Monetary; Hong Kong-Monetary, Banking; Tunisia-Monetary, Banking; Uganda-Monetary, Banking; United Kingdom-Monetary, Banking. Second-round assessments as part of FSSA-Updates include: Hungary-Monetary, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Payments.
+ The following ROSCs were assessed as part of the Financial Sector Assessment Program: Corporate Governance-Czech Republic, Georgia, and Latvia; Insolvency-Slovak Republic.
1ROSC modules not contained in an FSSA are considered complete once they have been circulated to Directors, and in the case of Bank-led modules, sent in their final form to the authorities. ROSC modules derived from an FSAP are complete only after the FSSA has been discussed by the Executive Board. For the purposes of this table, the Euro Area is counted as one economy.
2In the case of Cameroon and Senegal's Insurance ROSC, an assessment was conducted for the regional insurance supervision council CRCA (Commission Régionale de Contrôle d'Assurance).
3As Luxembourg is a member of a monetary union, the module does not include an assessment of the monetary component of the standard.
4For Senegal's Banking ROSC, on an exceptional basis, a preliminary assessment was included in the FSSA.


1The main authors of this report are Ydahlia Metzgen and Lynn Aylward, with data assistance from Winston Chi and Giang Do.
2See Quarterly Report on the Assessment of Standards and Codes-June 2002 (SM/02/192, 6/24/02) (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/stand/q/2002/eng/062102.htm). Quarterly Reports are issued roughly every three months, with some variation in timing related to the issuance of Reports of the Managing Director to the International Monetary and Financial Committee, which cover financial architecture initiatives and generally provide an update on the assessment of standards. The latest such report (SM/02/296, 9/16/02), available at http://www.imf.org/external/np/omd/2002/092502.htm, provided an update on ROSCs as of August 31, 2002.
3See IMF Executive Board Approves 12-Month Anti-Money Laundering Pilot Project (Press Release No. 02/52, 11/22/02), which is available at http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2002/pr0252.htm.
4See Statement by the Managing Director on the Work Program of the Executive Board (BUFF/02/174,10/23/02), which is available at http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/nb/2002/nb02111.htm.
5See also http://www.imf.org/rosc and http://www.worldbank.org/ifa/rosc.html.
6Follow-up to ROSCs in the period has provided twelve second-round ROSCs, which are included in the count of 77 additional modules.
7The rate of ROSC completion in the five-month period to September 30, 2002 period was high relative to the earlier period covered by the previous Quarterly Report on the Assessment of Standards and Codes-June 2002 (SM/02/192, 6/24/02) (available at (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/stand/q/2002/eng/062102.htm), when 27 modules were completed in the four-month period from January 1 to April 30, 2002. The rate of publication of the stock of ROSCs outstanding was little-changed from 72 percent as of April 30, 2002 to 73 percent as of September 30, 2002.
8Information on the seminars is available at http://www.worldbank.org/pos/index.htm.
9The mission comprised Mr. Enoch (STA); Mr. Sundararajan (MAE) and Ms. Aylward (PDR) (China only); Ms. Metzgen (PDR) and Mr. Ouanes (MAE) (Russia and Hungary only); and Mr. Esdar (World Bank). See the June 2002 and the June 2001 issues of the Quarterly Report on the Assessment of Standards and Codes (available, respectively, at (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/stand/q/2002/eng/062102.htm and http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/stand/q/2001/eng/062901.htm) for reports on earlier outreach missions.
10See Standards and Codes - Their Impact on Sovereign Ratings (available at http://www.fitchibca.com). The study found that publication of a ROSC made it more likely that a country received an upgrade or no change in rating rather than a downgrade in the period following the publication of the assessment, with a high level of significance.
11See http://www.standardandpoors.com/Forum/RatingsAnalysis/Corporate Governance/
12 The aim of the survey is to help develop a benchmark for the evaluation of levels of corporate disclosure. The survey covers 98 possible information items, such as whether corporate financial information is prepared in accordance with internationally recognized accounting standards.