November 24, 2000
Mr. Horst Köhler
Managing Director
International Monetary Fund
Washington, D.C. 20431
Dear Mr. Köhler,
The attached Supplementary Memorandum of Economic Policies
reaffirms the policy commitments described in our letter of intent dated February 11, 2000 and
provides an update of our policy for the remainder of 2000 and the first half of 2001. We have
fully met all end-June and end-September performance criteria underlying the program supported
by the Fund with a stand-by arrangement, which we continue to treat as precautionary. We are
encouraged by the fast recovery of the Estonian economy from the recession after the Russia
crisis, the better-than-expected current account developments, the strong confidence in our
currency board, and the strengthening of our financial system. We expect to meet the original
program targets for end-2000, and we have submitted a balanced budget for 2001 to parliament.
We are proceeding with the reform of the pension system and the strengthening of financial
sector supervision. We are making strong progress in meeting the conditions for early EU
accession.
We believe that the policies described in the attached memorandum
are adequate to achieve the objectives of our economic program. We will however, continue to
monitor developments closely and are committed to act decisively, if warranted. In particular,
should economic growth exceed current projections, we intend to use any additional revenues to
generate a budget surplus in 2001, so as to protect the balance of payments position. We are
herewith requesting the completion of the second review under the stand-by arrangement.
Sincerely,
/s/
Mart Laar
Prime Minister |
|
/s/
Vahur Kraft
Governor
Bank of Estonia |
Republic of Estonia
Supplementary Memorandum of Economic Policies
I. Introduction
1. The economic recovery from the effects of the Russia crisis gained
momentum in the first half of 2000, despite a sharp fiscal correction. The recovery was
importantly supported by rapid growth of our export markets, but also by our prudent policies
and further structural reforms, as outlined in our policy memorandum earlier this year. These
policies aimed at laying the basis for rapid economic recovery through maintaining
macroeconomic stability and increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of the Estonian
economy. In order to achieve sustainable fast economic growth and prepare the economy for
accession to the European Union (EU), we intend to continue these policies through 2001 and
beyond, and strengthen them where appropriate.
2. The strong growth in our key export markets in Finland, Sweden, and other
EU countries and deployment of new investments in the electronics sector and other exporting
industries, has led to a rapid increase in exports of goods and services by 39 percent in the
first half of 2000. Together with a recovery of private domestic demand, this resulted in an
increase in real GDP by almost 6½ percent in the first half of 2000 over the same
period in 1999. However, 1999 had been characterized by a recession, and output in the first half
of 2000 was only about 3¼ percent higher than in the first half of 1998. The
twelve-month inflation rate rose from 3.8 percent in December 1999 to 4.7 percent
in September 2000, largely reflecting the weakness of the euro and the sharp increase in
international energy prices, as well as the feed-through to transportation fees, and the extension
of VAT of 5 percent to thermal energy in June 2000. Unemployment has started to fall
recently with the rapid economic recovery, but remains above the level in 1999. The external
current account deficit in the first half of this year was 5.4 percent of GDP, which is lower
than in the same period of 1999, when it had amounted to 6¼ percent of GDP. The
debt service ratio has declined from already moderate levels because of strong non-debt creating
inflows financing much of the current account deficit and the increase in net foreign assets of the
banking system.
3. The tightening of fiscal policy that had begun in the second half of 1999
was continued in the first half of 2000, with a general government deficit of about 1.7 percent of
GDP, compared with 6.6 percent of GDP in the same period in the previous year. VAT has
performed better than projected, but excise tax collection was initially weak. So far, overall
revenue and expenditure performance has been broadly in line with expectations, as the
unexpectedly fast growth of exports (which are not taxed) has not yet resulted in revenues
exceeding projections.
4. Representing a catch-up after the slow growth in the monetary aggregates
in 1998 and much of 1999, broad money grew at about 25 percent (year-on-year) in the first half
of this year, and by 31 percent in the third quarter. Interest rates are near historic lows. While
there has been a slight upward tendency recently, this was less than in euro interest rates. The
commercial banking sector remains in a strong financial position, and the Bank of Estonia has
sold its equity stake in Optivapank in July 2000.
5. As regards structural reforms, we submitted to parliament a new budget
law that will make expenditure control more effective. While, after passage in parliament, the
new law will apply only to the budgets from 2002 onwards, we have already framed the budget
proposal for 2001 in accordance with the new law. The Bank of Estonia and the government also
agreed in June 2000 to establish a unified financial supervision agency and to provide strong
safeguards to ensure its budgetary and operational independence. Finally, a principal agreement
on the partial privatization of the electricity complex was reached in August 2000.
II. Policy Program through 2001
Macroeconomic Framework
6. While Estonia's economy has improved substantially over the past year, we
will remain vigilant to ensure that this improvement will be sustained. To this end, the currency
board arrangement will remain the cornerstone of our stabilization policies, supported by strong
fiscal policies to protect our external position.
7. We now expect real GDP to rise by 5½–6 percent in
2000 (rather than by 4 percent previously expected), and at a similar rate in 2001.
Economic growth will continue to be export-led, even though export growth is likely to slow
down somewhat from its very brisk pace in early 2000. We expect that investment will become
the second engine of growth. Barring further unforeseen external price increases, the rate of
average consumer price inflation is expected to remain between 4 and 5 percent in 2000 and
2001. With strong economic growth, the rate of unemployment should continue to decline
somewhat from its present high level of 13.2 percent. However, this is likely to be a gradual
process as the rapid transformation of the economy will continue to lead to closures of labor
intensive enterprises. Finally, with continued strong export growth, the external current account
deficit is projected to remain in the range of 6–7 percent of GDP in 2001, despite
the upward push on imports from strengthening domestic demand.
Fiscal Policy
8. As already noted, the economic recovery has been led by a rapid increase
in exports, which are not taxed. Therefore, while the recovery has been stronger than expected,
this has not yet led to higher revenues, nor to a weaker external position. Thus, the budget
outlook for the remainder of 2000 is broadly in line with earlier expectations, and the budget also
remains appropriate from a macro-economic point of view. Revenues are likely to meet budget
targets, with higher direct taxes and VAT compensating for relative weakness in excise tax
collection. The deficit of the central government is expected to be somewhat below earlier
expectations, while, with the economic recovery and the freezing of pensions, the Social
Insurance Fund will move towards balance after a deficit of close to 1 percent of GDP in 1999.
However, the municipalities may be running a higher deficit than planned. In particular, the City
of Tallinn has passed a supplementary budget (0.3 percent of GDP), the full implementation of
which could threaten achievement of our fiscal target this year. We are, therefore, trying to
persuade the municipalities to refrain from undermining our fiscal policy. In any case, we will
stand ready to cut back expenditure of the central government to compensate for any
overspending at the local level, to ensure that our fiscal targets are met. For this purpose, we are
already holding back spending until the overall fiscal position becomes clearer toward the end of
the year. Moreover, while we expect to recover some of the deposits lost in a bank failure in
1998, we do not intend to rely on these funds for meeting the budget target in consideration of
the one-off nature of these receipts.
9. We have submitted a balanced budget for 2001 to parliament. On the
revenue side, the ratio of direct taxes to GDP will fall on account of the completion of the
phase-out of the corporate profits tax and the introduction of higher exemptions for personal
income tax. This is expected to be only slightly offset by higher excise tax collection--as a result
of the introduction of excises on fuel components as from September 1, 2000, the introduction of
alcohol excise warehouses from January 1, 2001, and improvements in tax administration.
Moreover, non-tax revenue will also be smaller, as there will be no repeat of the bank deposit
recovery. On the expenditure side, the budget is based on a continuation of the general freeze of
nominal pensions and government wages, following the sharp increase in 1999, with the
important exception of salaries of teachers and cultural workers. The budget also includes the
transfer of education spending and their financing from the central government to the local
authorities, but this will not affect the consolidated budget. The continued freeze of pensions,
together with the effects of the economic recovery, is expected to move the central government
budget (including the Medical Insurance and the Social Insurance Funds) into a slight surplus,
covering the expected deficit of the municipalities. Should revenues exceed projections, we
intend to generate a fiscal surplus next year, so as to protect our external current account, and
prepare for the pension reform starting in 2002. Consistent with the target of fiscal balance for
2001 as a whole, but allowing for seasonal movements, we have set general government deficit
targets for March and June 2001 to cover the remainder of the program period (Table 1).
10. The government has made considerable progress in rationalizing and
streamlining the operations of the central government and the extrabudgetary funds, including
through the introduction of a comprehensive Treasury system in 1998 and the submission to
parliament of a new basic budget law in June 2000. The government intends to continue the
process of administrative reform through the early review of the structure of local government
finance. At present, there are 247 separate municipalities, each with its own budget and financial
administration. It has long been recognized that this system is expensive, unwieldy, and inhibits
effective control over public spending. Accordingly, the government intends to propose by
mid-2001 an approach to the restructuring of the system of local governments with a view to
reducing substantially the number of independent administrative units.
Monetary Arrangements and Financial Market Supervision
11. As already noted, the currency board arrangement will remain the
cornerstone of our economic policies. Within the currency board requirements, we continue to
streamline our operational framework to reduce the distorting effect of the high reserve
requirement and to bring it in line with that of the Eurosystem central banks. Following the
review envisaged in our original MEP, as of July 1, 2000, we have combined the reserve and
liquidity requirements into one uniform reserve requirement at 13 percent of the reserve base.
This change had a marginally tightening impact on banks' balance sheets by increasing the level
of mandatory intra-day minimum reserves. Moreover, as of January 2001, banks will be allowed
to invest up to 25 percent of their required reserves into highly rated foreign money market
instruments. We have also ceased the issuance of Bank of Estonia CDs as of April 20,
2000, as recommended by Fund staff. As described in our earlier policy memorandum, we are
carefully monitoring credit and monetary developments. We have already taken recourse to
moral suasion with key commercial banks and we are scrutinizing their lending plans, credit
policy, and risk strategies for the coming year. In addition, we would consider, if necessary, a
combination of monetary and financial policy measures to limit credit growth.
12. The Bank of Estonia has completed in June 2000 an assessment of
compliance with good practice codes for monetary policy as part of the Financial Sector
Assessment Program (FSAP). The FSAP concluded that vulnerabilities in the financial sector
had been substantially reduced.
13. The government and the Bank of Estonia agreed in June 2000 on the basic
structure of the agency that would unify supervision over the banking, insurance, and securities
industries (the Financial Supervision Agency or FSA). It is expected that enabling legislation
would be submitted to parliament by March 31, 2001, which would allow the FSA to commence
operations on January 1, 2002. It is already agreed that the FSA would have full operational and
licensing independence (consistent with the principles set out in the FSAP). In addition, the
legislation will also reflect international best practices in financial supervision, including full
protections from legal actions associated with the discharge of its core responsibilities.
14. We recognize that the banking sector plays a key role in ensuring
macroeconomic stability and the stability of the currency board, and will therefore ensure that
there will be no compromise in the standards of commercial banking supervision during the
transition to the FSA and thereafter. We are also mindful of the shortcomings in financial
supervision that were identified in the FSAP, in particular in the case of the Securities
Inspectorate. Accordingly, and to ensure a smooth transition to the new supervisory environment,
we will (i) submit the new Securities Market Law to parliament before end-December
2000; and (ii) proceed with the enhancement of the standards of supervision in the
Insurance and Securities Inspectorates; this may entail the commitment of additional managerial
resources as well as considerable assistance (twinning, training, IT systems) from the EU,
especially in the case of the Securities Inspectorate.
Other Structural Policies
15. We now expect that the pension reform proposal to establish a fully
funded voluntary second pillar will be submitted to parliament towards the end of December
2000, rather than December 1. This brief delay is needed to reach a broader political
consensus and refine the calculations. Under the government's proposal, 4 percentage
points of the 20 percent payroll tax will be redirected from the first to the second pillar for
workers who choose to participate, plus a further 2 percentage points to be contributed by
the participant. Participants would not be able to opt out of the second pillar after they join. The
question whether participation in the second pillar should become mandatory for new entrants in
the labor force is still under discussion. The reform is expected to be implemented from
January 1, 2002. While much will depend on the actual participation of employees in the
system, preliminary estimates suggest that the emerging deficit in the first pillar could initially
amount to about 1 percent GDP. We will also continue with the reform of the first pillar of the
pension system, including by introducing indexation to prices and the wage bill. This will ensure
the system's financial integrity over the medium term by removing decisions on discretionary
pension increases from the political sphere.
16. The sale of a minority stake in Narva Power Station to a foreign investor
is expected to be completed by mid-2001. This will signal the beginning of a major investment
program into Estonia's energy sector and should lead to substantial improvements in the
productivity of the electricity generation and oil shale mining industries. It will also bring with it
a sharp reduction in the harmful environmental impact associated with the production of
electricity. A special fund is being created by Narva Power Station to address the social
consequences of the restructuring. At the same time, the power purchase agreement associated
with this deal implies that Eesti Energia, buying a substantial amount of the Narva Power
Station's output of electricity, maintains a dominant position in this sector. This dominance is
enhanced through its simultaneous control over the Estonia's transmission system and most of its
distribution network. To ensure that Eesti Energia does not abuse its market power and that
independent producers enjoy reasonable access to the transmission and distribution networks (as
guaranteed under the 1998 Energy Act), the government has already upgraded the functioning of
the Energy Inspectorate, including by narrowing the focus of its work. The government will
continue this process by further enhancing staffing and seeking EU assistance in improving the
technical capacities of this agency. Our intention is to proceed with the privatization of the
energy complex after the completion of the sale of the stake in Narva Power Station.
17. The government is also at the final stage of the privatization of a
two-thirds stake in Eesti Raudtee—the major freight and transit line. The tender process has
identified a number of prospective buyers, and it is expected that a final selection will be made
by the end of this year. The government recognizes the importance of ensuring that the strategic
investor in Eesti Raudtee has the experience and the financial capacity to undertake the task of
upgrading and streamlining the railway, which plays such a crucial role in the export of transit
services.
III. Performance Monitoring
18. Progress in the implementation of the program will continue to be
monitored through quarterly performance criteria, which have now been set through the end of
the program through June 2001, and are presented in the attached table.
The definitions remain those of the Letter of Intent dated February 11, 2000, except for the
definitions of the performance criteria on the debt ceilings at end-March and end-June 2001,
which have been revised to bring them in line with the IMF Executive Board decision of
August 24, 2000.
Table 1. Estonia:
Quantitative Performance Criteria under the Program,
2000–011 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2000
Program |
March 31, 2001
Program |
June 30, 2001
Program |
|
|
|
(In millions of
EEK) |
I. |
Limit on cumulative general government deficit |
1000 |
1150 |
1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of
deutsche mark) |
II. |
Minimum levels of net international reserves of
the Bank of Estonia (January 1 through December 31, 2000)2 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of U.S.
dollars) |
III. |
Ceilings on new external short-, medium-, and
long-term debt of general government3 |
|
|
|
|
Maturity of 0–2
years |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Maturity of over 2
years |
250.0 |
300.0 |
300.0 |
|
of which:
Maturity of more than 2 years
but less than 10 years |
30.0 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
IV. |
The government will not accumulate any
payments arrears during the period of the arrangement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. |
The currency board is fully backed with foreign
exchange at all times |
|
|
|
|
1Definitions of the concepts
were set out in the Annex to the Memorandum of Economic Policies (EBS/00/18), except for the
definitions of the performance criteria on the debt ceilings at end-March and end-June 2001,
which have been modified in accordance with the IMF Executive Board decision dated August
24, 2000 (see footnote 3).
2The targets for net international reserves will be adjusted for the net proceeds of
the sale of Optivabank, as specified in EBS/00/18.
3The performance criteria on the debt ceilings for end-March and end-June 2001
apply not only to debt as defined in point No. 9 of the Guidelines on Performance Criteria with
Respect to Foreign Debt (August 24, 2000) but also to commitments contracted and guaranteed
for which value has not been received. Because of difficulties in ensuring effective monitoring of
leasing and import financing by local entities, such transactions by local governments are not
included under the external debt limits. |
|