Is Exchange Rate Stabilization an Appropriate Cure for the Dutch Disease?

August 1, 2010

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Juan Pablo Medina Guzman, and Ruy Lama. Is Exchange Rate Stabilization an Appropriate Cure for the Dutch Disease?, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 2010) accessed December 22, 2024

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary

This paper evaluates how successful is a policy of exchange rate stabilization to counteract the negative effects of a Dutch Disease episode. We consider a small open economy model that incorporates nominal rigidities and a learning-by-doing externality in the tradable sector. The paper shows that leaning against an appreciated exchange rate can prevent an inefficient loss of tradable output but at the cost of generating a misallocation of resources in other sectors of the economy. The paper also finds that welfare is a decreasing function of exchange rate intervention. These results suggest that stabilizing the nominal exchange rate in response to a Dutch Disease episode is highly distortionary.

Subject: Commodity prices, Consumption, Dutch disease, Exchange rates, Real exchange rates

Keywords: Learning by doing, WP

Publication Details

Pages:

43
Volume:

---
DOI:

---
Issue:

---
Series:

Working Paper No. 2010/182
Stock No:

WPIEA2010182
ISBN:

9781455202164
ISSN:

1018-5941

FACTSHEETS

RESOURCES

TOPICS

Flagship Publications

Other Publications

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional Offices

All News

See Also

For Journalists

Press Center

RESOURCES

FLAGSHIPS

KEY SERIES

IMF NOTES

IMF Working Papers