Shock Versus Gradualism in Models of Rational Expectations: The Case of Trade Liberalization

September 1, 1997

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Leonardo Auernheimer, and Susan M George. Shock Versus Gradualism in Models of Rational Expectations: The Case of Trade Liberalization, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 1997) accessed December 21, 2024

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary

This paper provides a new argument for “shock” versus “gradualism” in the implementation of trade policies. In the simple context of a small open economy with rational expectations, we consider the comparative welfare effects of eliminating an import tariff either immediately as an unanticipated shock, or gradually over a preannounced length of time. The gradualist policy introduces a distortion in consumption-accumulation decisions and generates welfare costs. And if the gradual change is extended over “too long” a period, these costs may exceed the long-run benefits of liberalization.

Subject: Commodities, Consumption, Foreign assets, Tariffs, Trade liberalization

Keywords: WP

Publication Details

Pages:

20
Volume:

---
DOI:

---
Issue:

---
Series:

Working Paper No. 1997/122
Stock No:

WPIEA1221997
ISBN:

9781451854459
ISSN:

1018-5941

FACTSHEETS

RESOURCES

TOPICS

Flagship Publications

Other Publications

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional Offices

All News

See Also

For Journalists

Press Center

RESOURCES

FLAGSHIPS

KEY SERIES

IMF NOTES

IMF Working Papers