The Pension Puzzle: Prerequisites and Policy Choices in Pension Design
Economic Issues, April 30, 2002
Source details
- Canonical URL
- The Pension Puzzle: Prerequisites and Policy Choices in Pension Design
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: N. A. Barr
- Published: April 30, 2002
- Series: Economic Issues
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589061118.051
Overview
- Examines policy choices involved in creating pension schemes, with particular focus on whether it is advisable to move away from government pay-as-you-go pensions toward private or publicly funded plans.
- Investigates the reasons for controversy surrounding pension design.
- Considers whether the second level of pension systems should be mandatory, private, funded, and defined-contribution.
Key questions and controversies
- Whether to replace or supplement government pay-as-you-go systems with private or publicly funded plans.
- The advisability and implications of making the second level of pension systems:
- mandatory
- private
- funded
- defined-contribution
- Sources of controversy in pension design, including distributional and fiscal trade-offs inherent in different system architectures.
Policy choices evaluated
- Government pay-as-you-go system versus private funded alternatives.
- Publicly funded plans as a middle path between pure pay-as-you-go and fully private provision.
- Design attributes for second-tier arrangements (mandatory vs. voluntary; private vs. public; funded vs. unfunded; defined-contribution vs. other benefit formulas).
Findings and emphasis
- The publication centers on prerequisites and policy choices rather than prescribing a single universal solution.
- Emphasizes examination of the political economy and technical trade-offs that drive controversy in pension reform debates.
- Highlights the specific policy design question of the nature and role of a second level in pension systems.
Source: N. A. Barr, The Pension Puzzle: Prerequisites and Policy Choices in Pension Design, April 30, 2002.