On July 27, 2016, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation 1 with China.
China continues its transition to sustainable growth, with progress on many fronts yet also many challenges. Growth slowed to 6.9 percent in 2015 and
is projected to moderate to 6.6 percent this year owing to slower private investment and weak external demand. The economy is advancing on many
dimensions of rebalancing, particularly switching from industry to services and from investment to consumption. But other aspects are lagging, such as
strengthening SOE and financial governance and containing rapid credit growth.
Inflation dipped below 1.5 percent in 2015 and is expected to pick up to around 2 percent this year, reflecting the rebound in commodity prices and the
exchange rate depreciation since mid-2015.
Infrastructure spending picked up and credit growth accelerated in the second half of 2015. Accommodative macro policies are projected to continue
supporting activity over the remainder of 2016.
The current account surplus is projected to decline to 2.5 percent of GDP this year (from 3 percent of GDP in 2015) as imports increase and the
services deficit widens with continued outbound tourism. The balance of payments came under pressure in 2015 due to large capital outflows, mainly
related to repayment of external debt. The volume of outflows is expected to moderate this year. After appreciating 10 percent in real effective terms
through mid-2015, the renminbi has depreciated some 4.5 percent since then and remains broadly in line with fundamentals.
Executive Board Assessment 2
Executive Directors commended the Chinese authorities for their strong determination to achieve more balanced, sustainable growth. They noted that economic
growth continues to moderate and is driven increasingly by services and consumption. Directors welcomed the impressive progress on structural reforms in
many areas, notably interest rate liberalization, internationalization of the renminbi, and urbanization. They also welcomed the 13th Five‑Year
Plan, with its ambitious goals centered on economic rebalancing.
Directors noted that China’s economic transition will continue to be complex, challenging, and potentially bumpy, against the backdrop of heightened
downside risks and eroding buffers. They stressed the need for decisive action to tackle rising vulnerabilities; reduce the reliance on credit‑financed,
state‑led investment; and improve governance, risk pricing, and resource allocation in the state‑owned enterprise (SOE) and financial sectors. Directors
emphasized that consistent, well‑coordinated, and clearly‑communicated policies are key to a smooth, successful transition, which will eventually benefit
the global economy.
Directors highlighted the urgency of addressing the corporate debt problem through a comprehensive approach. They encouraged the authorities to harden
budget constraints on SOEs; triage and restructure or liquidate over‑indebted firms; and recognize losses and share them among relevant parties, including
the government if necessary. Piloting a few SOEs would make a strong start to the process. Directors recommended that the authorities complement these
measures with targeted social assistance for displaced workers, and initiatives to facilitate entry of new, dynamic private firms.
Directors concurred that macroeconomic policies should be geared at lowering vulnerabilities, which would likely entail somewhat slower growth in the short
term. They welcomed the authorities’ intention to rely on fiscal support if growth falls sharply in the near term. To this end, they saw merit in using
on‑budget, pro‑consumption measures, which would help promote internal and external rebalancing. Measures could include raising pensions; increasing
social, education and health spending; providing restructuring funds; and cutting minimum social security contributions. Continued efforts are also needed
to ensure full implementation of the new budget law, improve fiscal transparency, and modernize the tax system.
Directors underscored the importance of further enhancing financial stability. Priorities include encouraging banks to proactively recognize loan losses
and strengthen capital ratios; enhancing supervisory focus on liquidity risk management and funding stability risks; and addressing vulnerabilities in
shadow products. Directors also recommended a major upgrade of the supervisory framework to foster cross‑agency information sharing and policy
coordination, reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, and enhance crisis management capabilities. They looked forward to the forthcoming Financial
Sector Assessment Program Update.
Directors noted the staff’s assessment that the renminbi is broadly in line with fundamentals, although the external position in 2015 was moderately
stronger than consistent with fundamentals. They welcomed steps toward an effectively floating exchange rate regime and encouraged the authorities to build
on this progress while carefully managing the transition, and with the support of a more market‑based monetary framework. Directors supported a cautious
approach to capital account liberalization that is carefully sequenced with the progress on exchange rate flexibility and financial sector reforms.
Directors encouraged the authorities to continue to improve data quality and policy communications, which would help reduce uncertainty, align
expectations, and guard against market turbulence.
|
China: Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projections
|
|
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
|
|
Real GDP
|
9.5
|
7.9
|
7.8
|
7.3
|
6.9
|
6.6
|
6.2
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
5.9
|
5.8
|
|
Total domestic demand
|
10.7
|
7.9
|
8.1
|
7.2
|
7.2
|
7.2
|
6.5
|
6.2
|
6.1
|
6.0
|
5.9
|
|
Consumption
|
12.2
|
8.7
|
7.2
|
7.2
|
8.3
|
7.8
|
7.7
|
7.1
|
6.8
|
6.6
|
6.4
|
|
Investment
|
9.2
|
7.1
|
9.1
|
7.1
|
6.1
|
6.4
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
|
Fixed
|
8.8
|
9.0
|
9.3
|
6.8
|
6.8
|
6.6
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
5.4
|
5.4
|
5.4
|
|
Inventories (contribution)
|
0.4
|
-0.7
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
-0.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Net exports (contribution)
|
-0.8
|
0.2
|
-0.1
|
0.3
|
-0.1
|
-0.5
|
-0.2
|
-0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Total capital formation (percent of GDP)
|
48.0
|
47.2
|
47.3
|
46.7
|
45.0
|
43.9
|
43.3
|
42.8
|
42.2
|
41.6
|
41.0
|
|
Gross national saving (percent of GDP)
|
49.8
|
49.7
|
48.8
|
49.3
|
47.9
|
46.3
|
44.9
|
44.1
|
43.2
|
42.4
|
41.6
|
|
LABOR MARKET
|
|
Unemployment rate (annual average) 1/
|
…
|
…
|
5.0
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
|
Wages
|
16.7
|
14.0
|
12.9
|
10.0
|
9.9
|
9.0
|
8.7
|
8.5
|
8.5
|
8.3
|
8.1
|
|
PRICES
|
|
Consumer prices (average)
|
5.4
|
2.6
|
2.6
|
2.0
|
1.4
|
2.1
|
2.3
|
2.4
|
2.6
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
|
GDP Deflator
|
8.1
|
3.2
|
2.4
|
1.2
|
0.4
|
0.7
|
0.9
|
1.4
|
1.6
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
|
FINANCIAL
|
|
7-day repo rate (percent)
|
6.4
|
4.6
|
5.4
|
5.1
|
2.5
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
10-year government bond rate (percent)
|
3.4
|
3.6
|
4.6
|
3.7
|
2.9
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
Real effective exchange rate (average)
|
2.8
|
5.6
|
6.3
|
3.1
|
10.1
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
Nominal effective exchange rate (average)
|
0.1
|
5.0
|
5.3
|
3.1
|
9.5
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
MACRO-FINANCIAL
|
|
Total social financing 2/
|
18.1
|
19.1
|
17.5
|
14.3
|
12.4
|
12.7
|
11.9
|
11.4
|
11.0
|
10.3
|
10.1
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
157.9
|
169.0
|
180.0
|
189.5
|
198.4
|
208.3
|
217.4
|
225.1
|
232.0
|
236.9
|
241.6
|
|
Domestic credit to the private sector
|
16.2
|
19.8
|
16.6
|
13.5
|
14.7
|
14.7
|
13.4
|
12.1
|
10.9
|
9.9
|
9.7
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
124.8
|
134.3
|
141.9
|
148.2
|
158.3
|
169.2
|
179.0
|
186.5
|
192.1
|
195.5
|
198.7
|
|
House price 3/
|
5.7
|
8.7
|
7.7
|
1.4
|
9.1
|
8.9
|
7.3
|
7.0
|
7.3
|
6.9
|
6.8
|
|
Household disposable income (percent of GDP)
|
58.3
|
59.4
|
60.0
|
60.7
|
62.2
|
63.2
|
63.6
|
63.9
|
64.2
|
64.2
|
64.2
|
|
Household savings (percent of disposable income)
|
41.0
|
40.8
|
38.5
|
37.9
|
37.4
|
36.9
|
35.8
|
34.7
|
33.7
|
32.7
|
31.7
|
|
Household debt (percent of GDP)
|
27.8
|
29.6
|
33.0
|
35.3
|
38.4
|
41.8
|
45.5
|
49.1
|
52.4
|
55.3
|
57.5
|
|
Nonfinancial corporate domestic debt (percent of GDP)
|
97.0
|
104.7
|
108.9
|
112.8
|
120.0
|
127.4
|
133.5
|
137.5
|
139.7
|
140.2
|
141.2
|
|
GENERAL GOVERNMENT (Percent of GDP)
|
|
Net lending/borrowing 4/
|
-0.1
|
-0.7
|
-0.8
|
-0.9
|
-2.7
|
-3.0
|
-3.1
|
-2.9
|
-2.9
|
-2.8
|
-2.7
|
|
Revenue
|
26.9
|
27.8
|
27.7
|
28.0
|
28.6
|
27.8
|
28.1
|
28.0
|
27.8
|
27.7
|
27.5
|
|
Expenditure
|
27.0
|
28.4
|
28.5
|
28.9
|
31.3
|
30.8
|
31.2
|
30.9
|
30.7
|
30.4
|
30.2
|
|
Debt 5/
|
15.2
|
15.2
|
15.9
|
38.5
|
38.3
|
38.6
|
39.1
|
39.3
|
39.3
|
39.2
|
39.0
|
|
Structural balance
|
-0.1
|
-0.5
|
-0.5
|
-0.5
|
-2.4
|
-2.9
|
-3.1
|
-2.9
|
-2.9
|
-2.8
|
-2.7
|
|
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS (Percent of GDP)
|
|
Current account balance
|
1.8
|
2.5
|
1.5
|
2.6
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
1.6
|
1.3
|
1.0
|
0.8
|
0.6
|
|
Trade balance
|
3.0
|
3.6
|
3.7
|
4.1
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
4.5
|
4.3
|
4.0
|
3.8
|
3.7
|
|
Services balance
|
-0.6
|
-0.9
|
-1.3
|
-1.6
|
-1.6
|
-2.0
|
-2.3
|
-2.6
|
-2.7
|
-2.9
|
-2.9
|
|
Net international investment position
|
22.4
|
21.8
|
20.7
|
15.2
|
14.3
|
16.5
|
16.9
|
16.7
|
16.3
|
15.5
|
14.8
|
|
Gross official reserves (bn US$)
|
3,256
|
3,388
|
3,880
|
3,899
|
3,406
|
3,181
|
3,064
|
2,993
|
2,890
|
2,813
|
2,740
|
|
MEMORANDUM
|
|
Nominal GDP (bn RMB) 6/
|
48,604
|
54,099
|
59,696
|
64,849
|
69,630
|
74,715
|
80,118
|
86,159
|
92,834
|
100,244
|
108,246
|
|
Augmented debt (percent of GDP) 7/
|
45.8
|
47.1
|
51.0
|
51.8
|
55.8
|
60.4
|
64.5
|
67.8
|
70.4
|
72.2
|
73.5
|
|
Augmented net lending/borrowing (percent of GDP) 7/
|
-6.0
|
-5.1
|
-7.6
|
-7.2
|
-7.8
|
-8.4
|
-8.2
|
-7.8
|
-7.4
|
-7.0
|
-6.6
|
|
Augmented fiscal balance (percent of GDP) 8/
|
-8.2
|
-7.8
|
-10.3
|
-9.8
|
-9.5
|
-10.1
|
-9.8
|
-9.3
|
-8.8
|
-8.4
|
-8.0
|
|
Sources: CEIC Data Co., Ltd.; IMF, Information Notice System; and IMF staff estimates and projections.
1/ Surveyed unemployment rate.
2/ After adjusting local government debt swap, staff estimate that TSF stood at 203 percent of GDP in 2015.
3/ Average selling prices estimated by IMF staff based on housing price data (Commodity Building Residential Price) of 70 large and mid-sized cities published by National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
4/ Adjustments are made to the authorities' fiscal budgetary balances to reflect consolidated general government balance, including government-managed funds, state-administered SOE funds, adjustment to the stabilization fund, and social security fund.
5/ Estimates of debt levels before 2015 include central government debt and explicit local government debt (identified by MoF and NPC in Sep 2015). The large increase in general government debt in 2014 reflects the authorities' recognition of the off-budget local government debt borrowed previously. The estimation of debt levels after 2015 assumes zero off-budget borrowing from 2015 to 2021.
6/ Expenditure side nominal GDP.
7/ Augmented fiscal data expand the perimeter of government to include local government financing vehicles and other off-budget activity.
8/ "Augmented fiscal balance" = "augmented net lending/borrowing" - "net land sales proceeds" (in percent of GDP) as we treat net land sales proceeds as financing.
|
1 Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the
country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments and policies. On return to
headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.
2 At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary
is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.